Country Table – South Africa
In 2016, Musawah began compiling country tables containing an overview of legislative frameworks, available case law, policies, procedures and practices…
South Africa is a secular, liberal, 26-year-old democracy with an estimated population of just under 59 million, of which Muslims constitute approximately one million. Islam came to South Africa in various phases. Slaves and political exiles were brought to the Cape in the middle of the 16th Century until the middle of the 19th century by the Dutch East India Company from their colonies in East and West Africa, South India, Ceylon, and the Malaysian Archipelago. The Cape Muslims comprise approximately 45 percent of the Muslim population in South Africa.
In a second phase in the mid-19th century, Indian Muslims were brought to South Africa by the British as indentured labourers and others as “passenger” Indians, who were mainly traders.
In the late 19th century several hundred slaves from East Africa were brought into South Africa as indentured laborers for the public works. The majority were Muslim, known as the “Zanzibaris”. In the early 20th century migrants from Malawi and Mozambique, many of whom were MuslimMaraisburg Muslim Jamaat webpage, 2010. “History of Muslims in South Africa” 23 October 2010. Accessed 12 January 2022, came to seek employment in the mines. Approximately 10-15 percent of Muslims are of mainly African origin. This number is currently increasing and not always documented, and due to an influx of economic migrants and refugees from East and West Africa.
South Africa recognises civil, customary, and same – sex marriages. It does not recognise all religious marriages- including Muslim marriages, and so these happen alongside or independently of civil marriages.outh Africa State party report, U.N. Doc. CEDAW/C/ZAF/1 (1998), pp. 104-105, South Africa State party report, U.N. Doc. CEDAW/C/ZAF/3-4 (2010), para. 16.1, http://www.ohchr.org/en/hrbodies/cedaw/pages/cedawindex.aspx. Accessed 10 November 2021 The main codified laws that govern civil marriages are the MarriageMarriage Act (1961), http://www.gov.za/sites/www.gov.za/files/Act%2025%20of%201961.pdf and DivorceDivorce Act (1979), http://www.justice.gov.za/legislation/acts/1979-070.pdf Acts.
Based on Section 3 of the Marriage Act, Muslim couples who intend for their marriage to be a monogamous one may enter into a parallel civil marriage at the same time as they contract their marriage based on Muslim rites.Hoodah Abrahams-Fayker, “Affidavit”, Women’s Legal Center Trust v. President of the Republic of South Africa, paras. 77-78 Muslim Family Law is practiced in unofficial forums but not recognised or regulated by the state. Both Muslim spouses in South Africa may stipulate any legitimate condition in their Islamic marriage contract. Similarly, both Muslim spouses in South Africa may stipulate any legitimate condition in their civil marriage contract provided it is not contra bono mores.
Often, the full list of valid conditions as provided by fiqh is not presented by most male Muslim marriage officers to the couple, thereby limiting choice of stipulations. Religious scholars and Muslim judicial bodies dissuade couples from clauses that upset the relationship of male qiwama over female partners.
The South African Marriages act treats men and women as equal partners, but in practice because Muslims only marry through nikah and do not enter in civil marriages due to first a lack of adequate legislation, second a lack of adequate knowledge about fiqh-based entry and exit options, and third, rigid ulama resistance to civil marriages, Muslim women have very little agency in entering and exiting nikahs.Ismail, Farhana. 2018. The MPL Network: Centering Women’s Experiences of Islamic Law. Daily Vox, 17 April. Available: https://www.thedailyvox.co.za/the-mpl-network-centering-womens-experiences-of-islamic-law-farhana-ismail/ .accessed 21 November 2021
Although the minimum legal age for marriage is 18 as per South African law,South Africa State party report, U.N. Doc. CEDAW/C/ZAF/3-4 (2010), para. 16.20, http://www.ohchr.org/en/hrbodies/cedaw/pages/cedawindex.aspx South African Muslim clerics may permit marriages of persons below 18. As Muslim marriages are not legally recognised, such under-aged Muslim marriages are not officially recorded.Information obtained from South African advocate, May 2017; Legal Resource Centre, “Submission made in respect of child, early and forced marriage”, Submission to the UN Office of the High Commissioner on Human Rights (OHCHR), 2013, pp. 7-8, http://www.ohchr.org/Documents/Issues/Women/WRGS/ForcedMarriage/NGO/LegalResourceCentre.pdf The Recognition of Customary Marriages Act allows for child marriage with the consent of parents and this could easily be extended to other customary/ religious marriages if the legislation exists.
When married through nikah and in civil law, Muslim wives are able to obtain a civil divorce through the Divorce Act, but concurrently obtaining a talaq either from the husband or through the Muslim judicial bodies proves difficult. Whether married in both systems or just in the religious system, Muslim wives struggle to be free of their nikahs.Ismail, Farhana. 2018. The MPL Network: Centering Women’s Experiences of Islamic Law. Daily Vox, 17 April. Available: https://www.thedailyvox.co.za/the-mpl-network-centering-womens-experiences-of-islamic-law-farhana-ismail/ .accessed 21 November 2021
When couples enter into the parallel system of marriage, ulama who are registered marriage officers will not allow alternative property regimes thus diminishing women’s legal capacity in relation to marital property at divorce. The power afforded to religious judicial bodies by the State legitimises discriminatory religious marriage practices.Seedat, Fatima. 2019. ‘Intersections and Assemblages: South African’s Negotiating Privilege and Marginality through Freedom of Religion and Sexual Difference’ in Forster, Dion., Gerle, Elisabeth. and Gunner, Goran. ed. Freedom of Religion at Stake: Competing Claims among Faith Traditions, States, and Persons. Oregon: Pickwick Publishers. 199-220.
Muslim women are not treated equally to other South African women in civil divorce proceedings. If a Muslim woman is intent on the material benefits that ordinarily accrue through marriage (or access to the marital property which the couple had worked for collectively) she is first compelled to launch an application in the High Court for legal recognition of her Muslim marriage through nikah. This is a costly process and places severe hardships on Muslim women and children.MPL Network, South Africa, CEDAW Shadow Report, 18- 21 November 2021, https://tbinternet.ohchr.org/_layouts/15/treatybodyexternal/SessionDetails1.aspx?SessionID=2489&Lang=en. Accessed 29 November 2021
Even in the absence of a civil law marriage, because children of unmarried parents have a right to maintenance from both parents, women in Muslim marriages can claim child maintenance from their children’s fathers. Spouses in Muslim marriages may approach the Courts to claim child maintenance and to action court orders for the same.
Because the South African Constitution establishes gender and sexual equality, a lack of codification can also work to the advantage of women. This can be seen in the work of the MPL Network which is focused on empowering women as wives, as they enter into nikah, attempt to exit or deal with the effects of having previously exited a nikah. The network has focused on negotiated, personalised nikah contracts and facilitated khula pronouncements when women choose to pronounce khula and exit a nikah.
The South African superior courts have a general jurisdiction over civil and criminal matters including divorce and family matters. At the lower court level there are designated divorce , maintenance and children’s courts.Catto, Amanda.“Family Law in South Africa: Overview.” https://uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com/Document/I63cd7e63e68b11e398db8b09b4f043e0/View/FullText.html?contextData=(sc.Default)&transitionType=Default&firstPage=tr . Accessed 28 November 2021 South Africa has clear processes stipulated for divorce, mediation, proprietary consequences, maintenance and child custody.“South Africa: Family Laws and Regulations 2022.” ICLG.com, 25 August.2021 https://uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com/Document/I63cd7e63e68b11e398db8b09b4f043e0/View/FullText.html?contextData=(sc.Default)&transitionType=Default&firstPage=tr
The challenges experienced by other South African women in the courts are also experienced by Muslim women. Court processes are too expensive, too intricate, formal and lengthy.Payne, Julien. “Family Conflict Management and Family Dispute Resolution on Marriage Breakdown and Divorce: Diverse Options.” Revue générale de droit 30.4 (1999): 663-687 Research in the maintenance courts point to a number of shortcomings which create severe hardships for women and children within the court systems.Singh, D., K. Naidoo, and L. Mokolobate. “Coming to court for child support-the policy, the practice and reality. A case study of black women in the maintenance system at the Johannesburg Family Court [2002-2004].” Acta Criminologica: African Journal of Criminology & Victimology 17.2 (2004): 143-154; Coutts, Tamazin L. A critical analysis of the implementation of the Maintenance Act 99 of 1998: difficulties experienced by the unrepresented public in the Maintenance Court as a result of the poor implementation of the Act. Diss. 2014.
South Africa is a State Party to the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women (CEDAW). South Africa signed the Convention in January 1993 and ratified the Convention on 15 December 1995, without entering any reservations.Department of International Relations and Cooperation South Africa. CEDAW convention. http://www.dirco.gov.za/foreign/Multilateral/inter/treaties/discrim.htm Accessed 13 November 2021
The previous CEDAW review was on 7 Jan – 4 Feb 2011.United Nations Treaty Body Database. https://tbinternet.ohchr.org/_layouts/15/treatybodyexternal/SessionDetails1.aspx?SessionID=2489&Lang=en. Accessed !3 January 2021 The most recent CEDAW review took place in November 2021, after Covid and other related delays. A CEDAW shadow report on Muslim marriages was compiled by the MPL Network in collaboration with, and supported by Musawah.
The CEDAW Committee recommendations noted the ongoing process to harmonize legislation governing all marriages in a single marriage act.
The Committee demonstrated its concern that the Recognition of Customary Marriages Act allows for child marriage with the consent of the parents, recommended that “the State Party expeditiously adopt a single marriage bill to align customary laws and practices in the field of marriage, in conformity with the Convention, including in relation to succession and inheritance and the custody of children, and to ensure that its provisions are enforceable under the jurisdiction of civil courts”.
It further recommended that the State party adopt legislation to recognize Muslim and Hindu marriages and amend without “delay, the Recognition of Customary Marriages Act to raise the minimum age of marriage to 18 years for both girls and boys without exception, and that it enforce the prohibition of child or forced marriage, particularly in rural areas and within traditional communities”.
Link to CEDAW reports that refer to Muslim family laws and practices
Link to Concluding Observations That Refer to Reform of Muslim Family Laws and Practices
Link to Musawah’s CEDAW reports on South Africa
Other treaties
Sustainable Development Goals
By local researchers, activists and civil society groups
By government agencies/committees
South African Legal Reform Commission (SALRC) forms a project Committee to investigate the possible recognition of Muslim marriages
Intended to apply to all religious marriages and was of general application.
The High Court is tasked with adjudicating the matter
Bill is not tabled and appears to be shelved. A group of 28 ulama representing as many religious institutions writes to the President declaring the Bill unacceptable and the processes to recognize and regulate marriage through nikah as ‘against the shariah’.The letter is available as a booklet online, published under the name of the United Ulama council, which name is disputed between an original group of Ulama that came together under this name early in the legislation making process in 1994, and a new group that contests the first groups legitimacy, and uses the name also. The distinction between the groups is discernible in the address used by the second group located in Meyerton. https://www.asic-sa.co.za/images/books/MMBUlama%20Objection%20Letter._pdf.pdf
That the state failed in its duty to recognise Muslim Marriages. The state is ordered to enact legislation within two years, failing which provisions of the Divorce Act would apply to Muslim marriages.
The SALRC Issue Paper on the Single Marriage Statute is released by the Department of Justice for public comment. The issue paper offers two possible scenarios for a Single Marriage Statute, either an omnibus statute consisting of different chapters for different marriage options or the inclusion of Muslim marriages into a single marriages act
In a separate but parallel process the Department of Home Affairs (DHA) announces the development of a new marriage policy and embarks on dialogues with various community stakeholders.
In the WLC matter the SCA ruled that the State had infringed its constitutional obligations and that both the Marriages Act and Divorce Act are unconstitutional for failing to include Muslim marriages. The matter is referred to the Constitutional Court
The State concedes that they are in breach of their constitutional obligations to recognize Muslim marriages but argue that they have no constitutional obligation to legislate the regulation of Muslim marriage. Judgment has been reserved in this matter.
This raises debate about the compliance of Islamic law with shared marital property regimes. The deadline for public comment was extended to January 2022.
The Court has found thathttps://wlce.co.za/victory-for-muslim-women-as-constitutional-court-judgment-recognises-their-right-to-equal-protection-in-marriage/:-
(a) The Marriages Act is inconsistent with the Constitution in as far as it fails to recognise Muslim marriages.
(b) The Divorce Act is inconsistent with the Constitution in as far as it fails to recognise Muslim marriages.
(c) The common law definition is inconsistent with the Constitution in that it fails to recognise Muslim marriages.
(d) The declaration of invalidity is suspended for 24 months to allow the state to remedy the breach by either enacting new legislation or amending existing legislation.
In 2016, Musawah began compiling country tables containing an overview of legislative frameworks, available case law, policies, procedures and practices…
This country page was prepared by Farhana Ismail (MPL Network) reflecting on the work of the Muslim Personal Law Network as a collaboration under the Campaign for Justice in Muslim Family Laws.
Acknowledgements: Dr Fatima Seedat on her inputs regarding the work of the MPL network.